Tuesday, May 15, 2012

台湾欢送，纳吉开双臂笑迎 苹果日报漫画讽刺国光迁厂


1000000人不信皇家调查报告，要求还原真相，还明福公道
阿Jib 哥上台不久就大喊经济转型，但是喊了这么久，转来又转去，过后团团转....原来就是为了安排一间又一间别的国家不要的毒厂进场。
涂鸦墙照片
《阿Jib哥的转型计划》

阿Jib 哥上台不久就大喊经济转型，但是喊了这么久，转来又转去，过后团团转....原来就是为了安排一间又一间别的国家不要的毒厂进场。...查看更多
上传者： 我们要改变 We want to change
 ·  ·  · 58分钟前发布 · 




振文
你以为是印尼的大便咖啡咩，人家的就真的是黄金啦！这个是遗臭万年的大便！

涂鸦墙照片
别人的大便，你拿来当宝...
Eye on Malaysia
上传者： 电话仔漫画 Ahfon's Comic



林瑞源‧新的引爆點

2012-05-15 09:06
台灣人不要的國光石化投資案，將轉移至柔佛州邊佳蘭。這是繼關丹萊納斯稀土廠之後，另一個備受爭議的計劃，也將成為大選課題。
大馬是產油國，石油被列為國家關鍵經濟領域之一，因此進軍煉油與石油化學工業是順理成章之事，石化工業也將帶來巨大的經濟效益。
但是，發展石化工業、獲取經濟財富，是不是意味著人民必須付出健康和環境代價？是不是跨越中等收入陷阱的國家，都必須做出犧牲，引進高污染工業？
投資360億令吉的國光石化投資案和萊納斯稀土廠一樣，存在同樣的疑問，為何別人不要的計劃，我們卻當寶？
台灣國光石化公司是在2005年提出大型石化投資開發案，原先預計在雲林縣離島工業區興建石化工業區，後因環評沒通過而於2008年轉往彰化縣。2011年4月22日，馬英九總統親自宣佈不支持國光石化案在彰化縣繼續進行。
國光石化投資案被指高耗水（每天用水40萬噸）、將造成台灣最大的濕地消失、可能造成附近生產的糧食有毒。此外，懸浮微粒PM2.5污染物飄散，估計每年將造成339至565人因心血管、肺癌死亡，呼吸道疾病也會增加。
國光石化可製造2萬個就業機會，但估算一年就要付出1千億以上新台幣的社會成本。
最後在台灣民眾、環保及保護生態組織的極力反對下，政治領袖聽取民意，讓它胎死腹中。
在國光石化案被拒之後，大馬貿工部副部長慕克力去年4月就表示歡迎國光遷至我國，台灣經濟部長施顏祥昨日在立法院經委會也證實，國光石化確實有跟大馬接觸。
在這1年期間，相信雙方商議了投資計劃的詳情，但是政府卻沒有徵詢民眾及本地專家的意見，和稀土廠一樣，缺乏透明度，在“生米煮成熟飯”時，引起民間強力反彈。
台灣6年來廣泛徵詢民意、專家進行深入研究，我們卻甚麼都沒有做，連環境評估報告都沒有公佈，就接納國光石化案，未免過於草率。
如果台灣媒體報導的“大馬提供10年免稅優惠”屬實，也令人納悶。為何要善待這麼高風險的投資計劃？萊納斯稀土廠享有12年的免稅優惠、國光石化10年，若最終國家要耗費巨資來修復環境，將得不償失。
看來當局並沒有從稀土廠事件中吸取教訓，反石化課題將持續發酵；一旦反稀土和反石化力量結合，國陣將有麻煩。
從正面的角度來看，稀土和石化課題將激發公民意識，可能加速國家政治的轉型。
（星洲日報／一心不亂‧作者：林瑞源‧《星洲日報》副總編輯


New tipping point

 2012-05-15 14:55
By LIM SUE GOAN
Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE
Sin Chew Daily
The rejected Kuokuang petrochemical investment project will be transferred to Pengerang, Johor. It is another controversial project after the Lynas rare-earth refinery plant project in Kuantan. It is believed to become an election issue, too.
Malaysia is an oil-producing country and oil has been listed as one of the national key economic sector. Therefore, it is a logical move to enter the refining and petrochemical industry, which is believed to bring huge economic benefits.
However, does it mean that the people must pay the costs of health and environment to develop petrochemical industry and gain economic wealth? Do all countries in the middle-income trap have to make sacrifices and bring in high-pollution industries?
Like the Lynas rare-earth refinery plant, people are having the same doubts over the RM36 billion petrochemical investment project. Why are we treasuring something that has been rejected by others?
The Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co proposed a huge petrochemical investment project in Taiwan in 2005, to build petrochemical plants in Yunlin. However, the location changed to the coast of central Zhanghua County in 2008 after failing the environment assessment. On April 22 2011, President Ma Ying-jeou announced his withdrawal of support for the project.
The Kuokuang petrochemical investment was accused of high water consumption, consuming about 400,000 tons per day, which would dry the largest wetlands of Taiwan and threaten food safety. In addition, it was estimated that 339 to 565 people would die of cardiovascular diseases and lung cancer, while patients of respiratory diseases would also increase due to the PM2.5 pollutants released into the air.
The project could create 20,000 job opportunities, but it was estimated to cost more than NT$100 billion of social cost yearly.
Eventually, political leaders listened to the public opinion and shelved the project under the strong opposition from the people, as well as environmental and ecological protection organisations.
Deputy Minister of International Trade and Industry Datuk Mukhriz Tun Dr Mahathir has expressed interest in the project since April last year after the project was shelved in Taiwan. Taiwan Economic Minister Shi Yanxiang also confirmed that the Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology Co does have contact with Malaysia.
It is believed that the two parties have negotiated details of the investment project since then, but the government did not consult the people and local experts. Like the Lynas rare-earth refinery plant, it lacks transparency. It could lead to a strong rebound from the civil society when the people are informed only after what is done cannot be undone.
The project had consulted public opinion and in-depth study were conducted for six years in Taiwan. As for us, isn't it too hasty to accept it without any prior studies is conducted and even before the release of the environmental assessment report?
We feel baffled if it is true that Malaysia is offering 10 years of tax-free concession as reported by Taiwan media. Why should we treat such a high-risk investment so well? The Lynas rare-earth plant enjoys 12 years of tax-free concession while the Kuokuang petrochemical plants enjoy 10 years of tax-free concession. It will not worth the candle if the country has to spend huge sums of money to repair the environment in the future.
The authorities do not seem to have learned a lesson from the Lynas rare-earth refinery plant controversy. The anti-petrochemical plant issue is expected to continue fermenting and once the forces opposing the rare-earth and petrochemical plants combine, it would be a trouble for the BN.
From a positive point of view, however, the rare-earth plant and petrochemical plant issues would raise civil awareness, which might help accelerate the country's political transformation.

【前线转载】这.....算不算国耻?
台湾欢送，纳吉开双臂笑迎
苹果日报漫画讽刺国光迁厂
来源：JBTALKS

涂鸦墙照片
【前线转载】这.....算不算国耻?
台湾欢送，纳吉开双臂笑迎
苹果日报漫画讽刺国光迁厂
来源：JBTALKS
http://www.fb.com/fb.top.news/ 只要like 了这个like page 您有智能手机或电脑上FB就能看到最新局势了赶紧通知身边的朋友加入吧！赶快加入 F a c e b o o k News 新闻最前线 获取更多即时综合新闻http://fb.me/fb.top.news
 ·  ·  · 14分钟前发布 · 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)